It’s not unusual for fans on social media to accuse sports analysts of being overly dramatic or hyperbolic with their takes, but it’s far less common to see analysts call out their own colleagues for it—especially on live television. That’s exactly what happened on Thursday morning when Stephen A. Smith took aim at fellow ESPN personality Dan Orlovsky during a heated debate on First Take.
The discussion centered around the New York Jets and the growing Super Bowl hype surrounding the team. As former NFL quarterback Orlovsky began making a case for the Jets’ potential, Stephen A. interrupted, accusing Orlovsky of engaging in “hyperbole for a living” and being “a bit hyperbolic” when calling games.
“That’s people like you, who engage in hyperbole for a living,” Smith said, not holding back. “Far be it for me to say that, it’s just the truth. The bottom line is that’s what you’re doing.”
Smith continued, elaborating on his point. “I watch you on NFL Live, I’ve seen you on Monday Night Football, I’ve seen you calling some of the games. You do get a bit hyperbolic from time to time.”
Orlovsky, taken aback by the unexpected criticism, responded with a stunned, “Holy fudge, dude.” His expression of surprise made it clear he wasn’t quite sure how to react, but the moment seemed to land in the realm of playful banter rather than genuine conflict.
Though the exchange might have seemed harsh, it appeared to be all in good fun. Orlovsky and Smith are known for their lively on-air chemistry, and ribbing each other is nothing new for the duo. The moment likely falls under their usual back-and-forth dynamic, with little to no actual malice behind Smith’s words.
RELATED: Rome Odunze’s Father Blasts Dan Orlovsky Amid Rookie’s Early Season Challenges
However, the irony of the situation wasn’t lost on viewers. If anyone at ESPN has a reputation for being hyperbolic, it’s Stephen A. Smith himself. Known for his passionate and often exaggerated takes on everything from basketball to football, Stephen A.’s larger-than-life personality is a cornerstone of his broadcasting style.
That’s what made his jab at Orlovsky even more humorous—coming from a man who’s practically built his brand on dramatic analysis, calling someone else out for hyperbole was as much a self-aware joke as anything.
Orlovsky and Smith often engage in spirited debates on First Take, and Thursday’s exchange was just another example of the fiery, yet friendly, interactions they’re known for. Whether discussing the NFL, NBA, or any other sports topic, their contrasting styles—Smith’s brashness versus Orlovsky’s measured approach—frequently lead to memorable moments on air.
In the end, it’s unlikely that Orlovsky took any real offense to Smith’s comments, especially given the good-natured tone of the conversation. The two have developed a rapport that allows for some friendly jabs without crossing into hostile territory.
While Smith’s critique of Orlovsky’s alleged hyperbole was a humorous twist for fans watching at home, it was all part of the show’s entertainment value.
Ultimately, it’s the dynamic between the two that keeps viewers tuning in. Whether they’re debating the Jets’ Super Bowl prospects or something else entirely, Smith and Orlovsky are bound to keep the lively banter—and occasional hyperbole—going strong.
Leave a Reply